This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy



Digital Business Lawyer

Federal Appeals Court upholds mandatory arbitration provision in Uber’s terms and conditions

In a case that could be seen as a game-changer in the world of clickwrap agreements and terms of service within mobile apps, Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Nos. 16-2750-cv, 16-2752-cv, 2017 WL 3526682 (2d Cir. Aug. 17, 2017) (‘Meyer’) has cleared the air as to what, in the view of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the ‘Second Circuit’), constitutes unambiguous consent when agreeing to a mobile app’s terms and conditions. Richard Raysman, Partner at Holland & Knight LLP, provides analysis of Meyer and the Second Circuit’s findings.

Sign up for a free trial for a week’s access to the entire latest issue of the journal
You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles.
Log in now
If you are not already a subscriber, take a subscription for full access to our entire online archives.
Subscribe

Search Publication Archives



Our publication archives contain all of our articles, dating back to 1999.
Can’t find what you are looking for?
Try an Advanced Search

Log in to digital business lawyer
Subscribe to digital business lawyer
Register for a Free Trial to digital business lawyer
E-Law Alerts
digital business lawyer Pricing

Social Media

Follow digital business lawyer on Twitterdigital business lawyer on LinkedIndigital business lawyer RSS Feed